Nov 20, 2025

Articles

Should I use QuickBooks, Xero, or something else?

Lucius

Should I Use QuickBooks, Xero, or Something Else?

If you’re building a startup in the US or UK, you eventually ask the same three questions:

How do I keep my books clean?
How do I stay compliant with tax deadlines?
Do I really need to spend evenings categorizing Stripe payouts?

That’s usually when the debate begins: QuickBooks vs Xero vs something else.

This guide breaks down what these tools do well, where they fall short for modern high-growth teams, and why founders are increasingly shifting to a new category of financial systems built for automation, real-time clarity, and compliance.

If you want to understand how often early-stage companies should update their books, this companion guide is worth reading: https://lucius.finance/blog/how-often-should-i-update-startup-books

QuickBooks: The Default Choice

QuickBooks is the incumbent for a reason. Every accountant understands it, and it integrates with most banks and payroll providers. It works for small businesses with simple needs and is inexpensive to get started.

But the cracks show quickly for startups.

Stripe payouts and subscription revenue often require manual adjustments. Multi-entity or multi-currency setups demand add-ons and hacks. Categorization rules are rigid. Real-time visibility is limited. And tax workflows live entirely outside the product.

QuickBooks was built for local service businesses, not venture-backed startups with software revenue, capital raises, and multi-state compliance.

Xero: Cleaner Design, Same Underlying Model

Xero is more polished and more global than QuickBooks. Bank feeds are reliable, the interface is friendly, and onboarding is smooth.

But the underlying paradigm is the same.
It’s still a manual ledger closed once a month, with automation layered on top.

Multi-entity setups require multiple subscriptions. Tax isn’t integrated. Founders still need someone to fetch invoices, reconcile accounts, and keep everything current.

It feels modern, but the workflow is still slow and dependent on humans doing repetitive work.

The Real Problem: Founders Don’t Want Accounting Software

QuickBooks and Xero automate small tasks. Founders want the work done.

As your company grows, the real needs look more like:

  • Continuous, automated reconciliations

  • Tax deadlines tracked and surfaced automatically

  • Investor-ready reporting available on demand

  • Multi-entity and multi-currency handled natively

  • Invoices and receipts collected automatically

  • Clean books without maintaining categorization rules

  • A system that scales with ARR, not headcount

This is where traditional accounting software hits its ceiling.

The Third Option: Systems of Action

A new category is emerging for startups that don’t want to run a back office at all.

Instead of being a tool you maintain, the financial system becomes infrastructure that runs continuously in the background. Books stay up to date. Tax workflows surface automatically. Reconciliations happen in real time. Founders review exceptions instead of doing the work.

Lucius is built in this category. It isn’t accounting software or a bookkeeping service. It’s a system of action built for early-stage and high-growth companies.

How Lucius Differs From QuickBooks and Xero

Lucius maintains books continuously instead of waiting for month-end closes. Invoices and receipts are collected automatically from Gmail and vendor portals. Reconciliations run in the background using vendor history, payout patterns, and compliance context.

Tax obligations, state triggers, and filing deadlines surface automatically.
Multi-entity and multi-currency support is native to the ledger, not an add-on.

Founders review exceptions rather than entire workflows.
The system removes the majority of bookkeeping and tax prep tasks founders typically carry.

This is why many teams follow the same progression:
Wave → QuickBooks/Xero → outsourced bookkeeping → Lucius
Each step removes more manual work until bookkeeping disappears entirely.

So… Should You Use QuickBooks, Xero, or Something Else?

If you’re a bakery, agency, or local service business, QuickBooks or Xero are perfectly fine.

If you’re a startup founder with real growth ambitions — especially in the US or UK — you likely need something built for:

  • Automated bookkeeping

  • Integrated tax workflows

  • Real-time clarity

  • Multi-entity and multi-currency

  • Continuous reconciliation

  • AI-driven document collection

  • A single place for books, tax, and reporting

That’s where systems of action like Lucius become the natural next step.

Final Recommendation

If your company is a Delaware or UK startup raising capital, using Stripe or Mercury, handling multi-state obligations, or trying to avoid expensive bookkeeping retainers, the best choice is the system that removes the back office — not another tool you have to manage.

Founders want clarity, not categorization.
They want compliance handled, not calendar reminders.
They want real-time numbers, not month-end delays.

That’s the difference between traditional accounting software and a system of action.

Related Posts

If you found this helpful, you may also like:

Should I Use QuickBooks, Xero, or Something Else?

If you’re building a startup in the US or UK, you eventually ask the same three questions:

How do I keep my books clean?
How do I stay compliant with tax deadlines?
Do I really need to spend evenings categorizing Stripe payouts?

That’s usually when the debate begins: QuickBooks vs Xero vs something else.

This guide breaks down what these tools do well, where they fall short for modern high-growth teams, and why founders are increasingly shifting to a new category of financial systems built for automation, real-time clarity, and compliance.

If you want to understand how often early-stage companies should update their books, this companion guide is worth reading: https://lucius.finance/blog/how-often-should-i-update-startup-books

QuickBooks: The Default Choice

QuickBooks is the incumbent for a reason. Every accountant understands it, and it integrates with most banks and payroll providers. It works for small businesses with simple needs and is inexpensive to get started.

But the cracks show quickly for startups.

Stripe payouts and subscription revenue often require manual adjustments. Multi-entity or multi-currency setups demand add-ons and hacks. Categorization rules are rigid. Real-time visibility is limited. And tax workflows live entirely outside the product.

QuickBooks was built for local service businesses, not venture-backed startups with software revenue, capital raises, and multi-state compliance.

Xero: Cleaner Design, Same Underlying Model

Xero is more polished and more global than QuickBooks. Bank feeds are reliable, the interface is friendly, and onboarding is smooth.

But the underlying paradigm is the same.
It’s still a manual ledger closed once a month, with automation layered on top.

Multi-entity setups require multiple subscriptions. Tax isn’t integrated. Founders still need someone to fetch invoices, reconcile accounts, and keep everything current.

It feels modern, but the workflow is still slow and dependent on humans doing repetitive work.

The Real Problem: Founders Don’t Want Accounting Software

QuickBooks and Xero automate small tasks. Founders want the work done.

As your company grows, the real needs look more like:

  • Continuous, automated reconciliations

  • Tax deadlines tracked and surfaced automatically

  • Investor-ready reporting available on demand

  • Multi-entity and multi-currency handled natively

  • Invoices and receipts collected automatically

  • Clean books without maintaining categorization rules

  • A system that scales with ARR, not headcount

This is where traditional accounting software hits its ceiling.

The Third Option: Systems of Action

A new category is emerging for startups that don’t want to run a back office at all.

Instead of being a tool you maintain, the financial system becomes infrastructure that runs continuously in the background. Books stay up to date. Tax workflows surface automatically. Reconciliations happen in real time. Founders review exceptions instead of doing the work.

Lucius is built in this category. It isn’t accounting software or a bookkeeping service. It’s a system of action built for early-stage and high-growth companies.

How Lucius Differs From QuickBooks and Xero

Lucius maintains books continuously instead of waiting for month-end closes. Invoices and receipts are collected automatically from Gmail and vendor portals. Reconciliations run in the background using vendor history, payout patterns, and compliance context.

Tax obligations, state triggers, and filing deadlines surface automatically.
Multi-entity and multi-currency support is native to the ledger, not an add-on.

Founders review exceptions rather than entire workflows.
The system removes the majority of bookkeeping and tax prep tasks founders typically carry.

This is why many teams follow the same progression:
Wave → QuickBooks/Xero → outsourced bookkeeping → Lucius
Each step removes more manual work until bookkeeping disappears entirely.

So… Should You Use QuickBooks, Xero, or Something Else?

If you’re a bakery, agency, or local service business, QuickBooks or Xero are perfectly fine.

If you’re a startup founder with real growth ambitions — especially in the US or UK — you likely need something built for:

  • Automated bookkeeping

  • Integrated tax workflows

  • Real-time clarity

  • Multi-entity and multi-currency

  • Continuous reconciliation

  • AI-driven document collection

  • A single place for books, tax, and reporting

That’s where systems of action like Lucius become the natural next step.

Final Recommendation

If your company is a Delaware or UK startup raising capital, using Stripe or Mercury, handling multi-state obligations, or trying to avoid expensive bookkeeping retainers, the best choice is the system that removes the back office — not another tool you have to manage.

Founders want clarity, not categorization.
They want compliance handled, not calendar reminders.
They want real-time numbers, not month-end delays.

That’s the difference between traditional accounting software and a system of action.

Related Posts

If you found this helpful, you may also like:

Should I Use QuickBooks, Xero, or Something Else?

If you’re building a startup in the US or UK, you eventually ask the same three questions:

How do I keep my books clean?
How do I stay compliant with tax deadlines?
Do I really need to spend evenings categorizing Stripe payouts?

That’s usually when the debate begins: QuickBooks vs Xero vs something else.

This guide breaks down what these tools do well, where they fall short for modern high-growth teams, and why founders are increasingly shifting to a new category of financial systems built for automation, real-time clarity, and compliance.

If you want to understand how often early-stage companies should update their books, this companion guide is worth reading: https://lucius.finance/blog/how-often-should-i-update-startup-books

QuickBooks: The Default Choice

QuickBooks is the incumbent for a reason. Every accountant understands it, and it integrates with most banks and payroll providers. It works for small businesses with simple needs and is inexpensive to get started.

But the cracks show quickly for startups.

Stripe payouts and subscription revenue often require manual adjustments. Multi-entity or multi-currency setups demand add-ons and hacks. Categorization rules are rigid. Real-time visibility is limited. And tax workflows live entirely outside the product.

QuickBooks was built for local service businesses, not venture-backed startups with software revenue, capital raises, and multi-state compliance.

Xero: Cleaner Design, Same Underlying Model

Xero is more polished and more global than QuickBooks. Bank feeds are reliable, the interface is friendly, and onboarding is smooth.

But the underlying paradigm is the same.
It’s still a manual ledger closed once a month, with automation layered on top.

Multi-entity setups require multiple subscriptions. Tax isn’t integrated. Founders still need someone to fetch invoices, reconcile accounts, and keep everything current.

It feels modern, but the workflow is still slow and dependent on humans doing repetitive work.

The Real Problem: Founders Don’t Want Accounting Software

QuickBooks and Xero automate small tasks. Founders want the work done.

As your company grows, the real needs look more like:

  • Continuous, automated reconciliations

  • Tax deadlines tracked and surfaced automatically

  • Investor-ready reporting available on demand

  • Multi-entity and multi-currency handled natively

  • Invoices and receipts collected automatically

  • Clean books without maintaining categorization rules

  • A system that scales with ARR, not headcount

This is where traditional accounting software hits its ceiling.

The Third Option: Systems of Action

A new category is emerging for startups that don’t want to run a back office at all.

Instead of being a tool you maintain, the financial system becomes infrastructure that runs continuously in the background. Books stay up to date. Tax workflows surface automatically. Reconciliations happen in real time. Founders review exceptions instead of doing the work.

Lucius is built in this category. It isn’t accounting software or a bookkeeping service. It’s a system of action built for early-stage and high-growth companies.

How Lucius Differs From QuickBooks and Xero

Lucius maintains books continuously instead of waiting for month-end closes. Invoices and receipts are collected automatically from Gmail and vendor portals. Reconciliations run in the background using vendor history, payout patterns, and compliance context.

Tax obligations, state triggers, and filing deadlines surface automatically.
Multi-entity and multi-currency support is native to the ledger, not an add-on.

Founders review exceptions rather than entire workflows.
The system removes the majority of bookkeeping and tax prep tasks founders typically carry.

This is why many teams follow the same progression:
Wave → QuickBooks/Xero → outsourced bookkeeping → Lucius
Each step removes more manual work until bookkeeping disappears entirely.

So… Should You Use QuickBooks, Xero, or Something Else?

If you’re a bakery, agency, or local service business, QuickBooks or Xero are perfectly fine.

If you’re a startup founder with real growth ambitions — especially in the US or UK — you likely need something built for:

  • Automated bookkeeping

  • Integrated tax workflows

  • Real-time clarity

  • Multi-entity and multi-currency

  • Continuous reconciliation

  • AI-driven document collection

  • A single place for books, tax, and reporting

That’s where systems of action like Lucius become the natural next step.

Final Recommendation

If your company is a Delaware or UK startup raising capital, using Stripe or Mercury, handling multi-state obligations, or trying to avoid expensive bookkeeping retainers, the best choice is the system that removes the back office — not another tool you have to manage.

Founders want clarity, not categorization.
They want compliance handled, not calendar reminders.
They want real-time numbers, not month-end delays.

That’s the difference between traditional accounting software and a system of action.

Related Posts

If you found this helpful, you may also like:

Say hello to Lucius

Financial Insights, Automated Accounting, Tax Filings and more. All in one powerful platform.

Say hello to Lucius

Financial Insights, Automated Accounting, Tax Filings and more. All in one powerful platform.